Outrage at the Oval and Koizumi Wins

This weekend has been quite intense - i'm still not really getting anywhere with my thesis (i've tried, trust me), the Aussies have been rorted, and Japan's Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi has won comfortably in Japan's general election.

Skipping the thesis, i'm going to first talk about what happened last night. Australia screwed up bigtime - giving the game back to England by sheer incompetence. Incompetence in playing swing bowling. Going from 2/270 odd to faling short of England's total is really quite poor. It was time for England to have a bat... and what happens - the umpires decide it's too dark for the Aussie pacemen to bowl. Ok, fine.

So what happens? The master, Shane Warne, is brought into the attack - and dismisses Andrew Strauss, 1/2! Not too long afterwards the umpires have another chat and decide to stop play altogether. What the hell? Australia were going to bowl two spinners (only one of which is a real full-time spinner) ... the light wasn't so bad that you couldnt' see a ball being bowled slowly. The English batsmen seemed to be hitting the ball just fine.

I really don't see how Australia had an unfair advantage given the supposedly-low level of light. Rudi, the South African umpire, said that it was highly possible that the batsmen could lose sight of the ball when the ball was being bowled slowly. Really? I'm sure that if that was the case then it would be a loss of concentration rather than due to the light. Even if it was potentially hard to see the ball when batting... then it would be hard for the fieldsmen to see the ball as well? (Potential for drop catches and boundaries due to poor visibility). PLUS Australia was going to bowl a part time spinner - hardly advantageous to the Aussies. I find the whole situation ridiculous - we want a result here... win or lose. Keeping the fight going between Australia and England would have been the best thing for cricket - unfortunately the umpires didn't agree.

So there's my rant on The Ashes. Another thing i'd like to mention is the amazing victory of Japan's Liberal Democratic Party (LDP). The LDP, along with its coalition party New Komeito Party, has won 327 seats out of the 480-member House of Representatives. That's an amazing victory, approximately a two-thirds majority. This election saw the highest voter turnout in over a decade - 67.52%. A great turnout and a great result.

The early election was called due to the failure of the Japanese Diet (parliament) to pass Koizumi's bills on postal reform - that being the privatisation of Japan Post. Koizumi dissolved the Diet and called for an election (I think it's over a year before the end of term).

Why was/is postal reform such an issue in Japan? Well first of all Japan Post is a big mofo. It's one of the largest financial institutions in the world. Japan Post is not only a post office but it effectively acts as a bank as well. Having this behemoth being owned by the government is asking for trouble. A big cash cow for the government leads to lots of spending on useless projects (sounds alot like student Unions having a cash cow, the students, to waste money on things that people hardly use). Japan Post, as far as I could tell, was somewhat corrupted as it provided funding for politically-aimed projects... effectively "vote buying" in disguise.

Well done Koizumi.